Emotional intelligence and metacognitive awareness as predictors of innovative work behavior: The mediating roles of psychological capital, work engagement, and psychological well-being and the moderating role of perceived organizational support

Authors

  • Syed Danish Ali Shah PhD Scholar at Quaid-i-Azam School of Management Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author
  • Prof. Dr. Muhammad Irfanullah Arfeen Professor at Quaid-i-Azam School of Management Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71085/rjhsa.04.04.138

Keywords:

Emotional Intelligence, Metacognitive Awareness, Psychological Capital, Work Engagement, Psychological Well-Being, Perceived Organizational Support, Innovative Work Behavior, Higher Education Faculty, JD-R Theory

Abstract

Faculty innovation is essential for enhancing teaching, research, and institutional performance in higher education. However, limited research has explained how emotional intelligence and metacognitive awareness jointly foster innovative work behavior through underlying psychological mechanisms, particularly in developing-country contexts. Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) theory, this study examines the roles of psychological capital, work engagement, psychological well-being, and perceived organizational support in explaining faculty innovation. Data were collected from 270 faculty members employed in public universities across Pakistan and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings indicate that emotional intelligence and metacognitive awareness positively influence psychological capital and work engagement, which subsequently enhance psychological well-being. Psychological well-being emerged as the strongest predictor of innovative work behavior, while perceived organizational support strengthened this relationship. The study extends JD-R theory by integrating emotional and cognitive personal resources within a unified motivational framework and demonstrates how individual and organizational resources jointly promote faculty innovation. The findings also provide practical guidance for universities seeking to enhance faculty well-being, engagement, and innovative performance through supportive organizational practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adil, A., & Kamal, A. (2019). Authentic leadership and psychological capital in job demands-resources model among Pakistani university teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(4), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1594330

Afsar, B., & Badir, Y. (2017). Workplace spirituality, perceived organizational support and innovative work behavior: The mediating effects of person–organization fit. Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2015-0086

Anwar, S., Saraih, U. N., & Soomro, B. A. (2025). Unveiling the role of emotional intelligence as a mediator between digital leadership and employee cynicism: A study in private higher educational institutes. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 33(5), 1180–1202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2024-4499

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands–resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2024). Job demands–resources theory: Frequently asked questions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 29(3), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000376

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933

Cohen, J. (1988). Set correlation and contingency tables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12(4), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168801200410

da Costa, M. G., Pinto, L. H., Martins, H., & Vieira, D. A. (2021). Developing psychological capital and emotional intelligence in higher education: A field experiment with economics and management students. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(3), Article 100516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100516

De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2023). Job demands–resources theory in times of crises: New propositions. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(3), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221135022

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands–resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Deniz, Ü., & Kocabaş, C. (2024). Understanding the relationship between perceived organizational support and psychological well-being: Perspectives of Turkish faculty members. Higher Learning Research Communications, 14(1), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v14i1.1467

Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2015100101

Lu, C., Xu, Z., & Tian, Q. (2025). Teachers' well-being and innovative work behavior: A moderated mediation model of perceived insider status and principal authentic leadership. Behavioral Sciences, 15(10), Article 1419. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15101419

Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033

Shah, M. H. (2025). Strengthening innovative work behavior via psychological capital: A moderated mediation framework. FishTaxa–Journal of Fish Taxonomy, 36(1S), 90–101.

Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Velasquez Estrada, J. M., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4552–4564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.049

Sultana, N., Ahmad, A., Awi, N. A., & Usman, M. (2024). Mediating effect of employee engagement on psychological capital and employee innovative work behavior among teaching staff of Pakistan public sector HEIs. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 7.

Tjimuku, M., Atiku, S. O., & Kaisara, G. (2025). Emotional intelligence and psychological capital at work: A systematic literature review and directions for future research. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), Article 2443559. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2443559

Wahid, M., & Ayub, N. (2024). Predictive role of psychological capital and perceived organizational support on innovative work behavior among higher education teachers of Pakistan. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 11(2), 191–219.

Wong, C. S., & Law, K. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1

Yang, X., Cai, X., & Cai, J. (2024). The effect of the tenure track on faculty members' job insecurity and innovative work behavior. Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01234-x

Zargar, P., Daouk, A., & Chahine, S. (2025). Driving innovative work behavior among university teachers through work engagement and perceived organizational support. Administrative Sciences, 15(7), Article 246. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15070246

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Shah, S. D. A., & Arfeen, P. D. M. I. (2026). Emotional intelligence and metacognitive awareness as predictors of innovative work behavior: The mediating roles of psychological capital, work engagement, and psychological well-being and the moderating role of perceived organizational support. Research Journal of Human and Social Aspects, 4(4), 60-86. https://doi.org/10.71085/rjhsa.04.04.138